Despite a lackluster second term that has been more about reaction than action, President Obama is still a successful president, seemingly against all odds. From the very beginning of his presidency, Mitch McConnell vowed to make him a one-termer, and failing that, he would obstruct obstruct obstruct to the point that it would cripple the administration. It became so bad, that Harry Reid, who is someone I do not love, had to take the nuclear option on filibusters, otherwise no one would have been appointed to do the government's work at all. Anywhere else in the world, this kind of obstruction would not be rewarded. However, the people of Kentucky, where over 400,000 people enrolled in insurance under the Affordable Care Act, re-elected McConnell, the same person who attempted to kill the program at every step of the way. How does this make sense?
Frankly, it doesn't.
The list goes on: Scott Walker, Sam Brownback, Rick Scott. These are all Governors that have done harm to their states - Wisconsin, Kansas, and Florida, respectively. However, all three were re-elected. Why is this?
There are certainly many possible answers and many tracts to take. However, the root problem is one that is years in the making, and unfortunately, it is one that we cannot change without years of sustained "re-education" of the electorate. The Democratic Party has failed to make the case for electing its candidates. Of course, one could say Barack Obama is proof that I am wrong, but I would posit that he is an anomaly and so is Bill Clinton, for that matter. Both of those individuals were elected because of their personality, or at least the personae that they portrayed on the campaign trail. It wasn't because they were particularly "Democrats." Yes, they stood by party principles, but the power of their charisma is what elected them. Once you take them away, what do we have? After overwhelming majorities in the 80's and early 90's, there has been a chip, chip, chipping away of the Democratic foundation, with major wave elections in 1994 and 2010 in favor of the Republicans.In the past 20 or 30 years, we have seen massive polarization of the left and right, but where the left tends to be more pragmatic and open minded (not always, mind you), the right has become more hard-lined. The conservatives and their propaganda arm, FoxNews and the Koch Brothers funded Super PACS, have defined the words "Democrat" and "Liberal" as designations so fallow that they are used as epithets, even though large numbers of the rural, poor Republican base, specifically in the south, benefits from programs Democrats champion. Democrats have become synonymous with "big government" and "freeloaders," even has Republican's plan greater intrusions into our lives and prop up businesses in greater proportion to money spent on the social safety net.
Unfortunately, instead of embracing what makes our populist and liberal stances great, the leadership of the party has decided they need to hew closer to the center right to win over conservatives instead of educating people as to why our way is better. There is empirical data ad infinitum that proves that Republican economic policies have not worked, and the proof is in the economic data out now about the successes of the Obama administration. However, instead of running towards our sitting president and helping cultivate his message, the majority of candidates ran away from him, precisely as the Republican's made it all about him. If the time and money had been spent drilling home a message of success, then maybe we could have had more wins in these midterms. Instead, the party threw up their hands in defeat, and consequently, they never defined where we stood. Sure, the Republican's didn't either, but the onus was on us. The party failed.
There is not much left for Obama to do except to ride out the next two years. He's essentially a lame duck now, but he might be able to make some changes within the party to get the ball rolling for a competitive 2016. If I knew where to begin, I probably wouldn't be blogging about it (I would be trying to get a job to fix it), but for Hillary (or any Democrat) to win and actually have a shot at the history books beyond the gender milestone, then the Democratic Party needs to win the message war. It needs to fight, and it needs to start now!
***Note: Part of the reason I haven't been blogging on the regular is because most of my quick bites go out on Facebook. However, with the turn of the election screw, my political bent is in full force. If you come here, you should expect a lot of politics from here on out, but I'll try to break it up. ***
No comments:
Post a Comment